Abstract
The Sphere Encoder is an efficient generative model that produces images in a single forward pass by mapping images to a spherical latent space and decoding from random points on that sphere, achieving diffusion-like quality with significantly reduced inference costs.
We introduce the Sphere Encoder, an efficient generative framework capable of producing images in a single forward pass and competing with many-step diffusion models using fewer than five steps. Our approach works by learning an encoder that maps natural images uniformly onto a spherical latent space, and a decoder that maps random latent vectors back to the image space. Trained solely through image reconstruction losses, the model generates an image by simply decoding a random point on the sphere. Our architecture naturally supports conditional generation, and looping the encoder/decoder a few times can further enhance image quality. Across several datasets, the sphere encoder approach yields performance competitive with state of the art diffusions, but with a small fraction of the inference cost. Project page is available at https://sphere-encoder.github.io .
Community
Technical report
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Latent Forcing: Reordering the Diffusion Trajectory for Pixel-Space Image Generation (2026)
- Laminating Representation Autoencoders for Efficient Diffusion (2026)
- Improving Reconstruction of Representation Autoencoder (2026)
- PixelGen: Pixel Diffusion Beats Latent Diffusion with Perceptual Loss (2026)
- Adaptive 1D Video Diffusion Autoencoder (2026)
- DINO-SAE: DINO Spherical Autoencoder for High-Fidelity Image Reconstruction and Generation (2026)
- Unified Latents (UL): How to train your latents (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Apologies if this sounds mean-spirited... this is one of the worst papers I have ever taken the time to read.
The "sphere" isn't novel. The paper frames projecting latents onto a hyper-sphere as a key geometric insight, but in high dimensions, samples from a standard Gaussian already concentrate on a thin spherical shell. L2-normalizing them is a near-trivial perturbation. The paper's uniformity objective is approximately equivalent to adding sufficient Gaussian noise and normalizing, which is not a new technique.
The random Gaussian matrix is mathematically inert. For a square matrix, this is approximately a random orthogonal rotation, which by definition cannot change the distance structure or distribution geometry of the latents. The uniform distribution on the sphere is rotationally invariant so this step provably accomplishes nothing. It also carries enormous memory cost; for realistic latent sizes, the matrix would require an insane amount of memory / storage.
The compression ratios are trivially low. Three of their four models use a 1.5:1 volume compression ratio; the fourth uses 3:1. For comparison, standard image encoders operate at 32:1 to 48:1. At 1.5:1 the latent retains two-thirds of the raw image information, making high-quality reconstruction trivially easy regardless of latent space geometry, regularization strategy, or model architecture.
The models are massively over-parameterized for the task. ~950M parameters to reconstruct from a 1.5:1 compressed latent is roughly two orders of magnitude more capacity than necessary. This makes it impossible to attribute the quality of results to the paper's claimed contributions; nearly any architecture and latent structure would succeed under these conditions.
Discontinuous latent-to-image mappings are presented as a feature. They acknowledge sharp transitions in image space for nearby latent points but frame this positively. This is inconsistent with the broader generative modeling literature, where smooth latent spaces are considered essential for interpolation, editing, and meaningful learned representations. Their decoder likely has an extremely high Lipschitz constant and functions more like a lookup table / hash-map than a generative model.
Taken together, the paper's theoretical contributions either replicate known mathematical properties or are provably ineffective, while its empirical results are achieved under conditions (extreme over-parameterization, near-zero compression) that make the claimed contributions unfalsifiable. A convincing evaluation would hold compression ratio and parameter count comparable to existing LDMs and demonstrate that the spherical framework still provides a benefit.
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 1
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper